Static Branch Predictor

A static branch predictor is a type of branch predictor that makes predictions based on fixed patterns or heuristics, without considering the runtime behavior of the program. Unlike dynamic branch predictors that use historical information to make predictions, static predictors do not adapt to changes in branch behavior during program execution.

Static branch predictors are generally simple and have low implementation complexity. They make predictions based on assumptions or statistical patterns observed in typical program behavior. Some common types of static branch predictors include:

1. Always Taken: This predictor assumes that all branches will be taken. It predicts "taken" for every branch instruction encountered.

2. Always Not Taken: This predictor assumes that all branches will not be taken. It predicts "not taken" for every branch instruction.

3. Backward Taken, Forward Not Taken (BTFNT): This predictor assumes that backward branches (branches that loop back to a previous instruction) are likely to be taken, while forward branches (branches that go to future instructions) are likely not to be taken.

4. Branch Target Buffer (BTB): This predictor uses a table to store the target addresses of previously encountered branches. It assumes that if a branch has been seen before, it will likely branch to the same target address again.

Static branch predictors are easy to implement and have low hardware complexity. However, their accuracy is limited as they do not adapt to changing program behavior. They work well for programs with predictable branch patterns, but they can suffer from poor prediction accuracy in programs with irregular or dynamic branching behavior.

Static predictors are often used as a baseline or fallback option when more advanced and adaptive branch predictors, such as dynamic predictors, are not available or do not provide accurate predictions. They serve as a simple and low-cost solution for processors or architectures where advanced branch prediction mechanisms are not feasible or necessary.

In layman terms, 

A relevant example of a static predictor in a real-life scenario for a layman can be found in traffic signal systems. Traffic lights operate based on predefined patterns and timing intervals, making them akin to a static branch predictor.

Consider a scenario where the traffic light at an intersection cycles through a fixed pattern of green, yellow, and red lights. Each traffic light phase has a predetermined duration, such as green for 30 seconds, yellow for 5 seconds, and red for 45 seconds.

In this case, the traffic signal system acts as a static predictor, making predictions based on the fixed pattern. For example:

- Always Taken: The green light phase is always taken after the red light phase, allowing traffic to flow in that direction.

- Always Not Taken: The red light phase is always not taken after the green light phase, stopping traffic in that direction.

- BTFNT: The green light phase is typically taken for the backward branches (main road) where the traffic is expected to continue, while the red light phase is typically not taken for the forward branches (side road) where the traffic is expected to stop.

These static predictions are based on assumptions about traffic patterns and are not adaptable to real-time traffic conditions or changing demands. They rely on a fixed timing schedule and predetermined patterns to manage the flow of traffic at intersections.

While static predictors, like traffic signal systems, work reasonably well in many scenarios, they may not always accurately reflect the current traffic conditions. Advanced traffic management systems employ dynamic and adaptive predictors, such as sensors, cameras, or machine learning algorithms, to adjust signal timings in real-time based on the actual traffic flow.

​

Pseudocode logic for a 1 bit static branch predictor would be something like this: ​